1. Hey Guest, you may be unaware of our steam group. You should join it to receive new information about events etc. on the server!

    http://steamcommunity.com/groups/concordiagaming

    Note: Do not use the Steam group to rant about your ban or to ask to be unbanned. It won't make your situation any better.

Let 106 escape contaiment by himself sometimes

Discussion in 'Server Discussion' started by Chan, Sep 16, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Chan

    Chan Active Member

    So i would put this in suggestions but i think it should be here first, and if it gets enough support (which i doubt it will) ill make a suggestion. But anyways my disscution is kinda in the title and i know alot of people will be like "no fuck off" but hear me out, on the SCP wiki it saids that "Note: Continued research and observation have shown that, when faced with highly complex/random assemblies of structures, SCP-106 can be “confused”, showing a marked delay on entry and exit from said structure. SCP-106 has also shown an aversion to direct, sudden light. This is not manifested in any form of physical damage, but a rapid exit in to the “pocket dimension” generated on solid surfaces." and that "These observations, along with those of lead-aversion and liquid confusion, have reduced the general escape incidents by 43%." so what i inturpretated from this is that 106 gets confuesed when trying to leave BUT it also states that the breach potential has gone down 43% but that doesnt mean 106 hasent breach before that stills like a 57% chance that he can breach. so what i propese is that every 20 to 30 mins (this number can be changed) 106 can advert saying he tries breaching and after that time he adverts that hes breached and he does his thing. After hes recontained he has to wait like an 1 or 2 hours to try to rebreach (the time on that is kinda long but its for good reason) but if we are doing this admins will have to watch 106 very carefully that he just doesnt breach get recontained flag down then flag back up and shit like that. Now i do see alot of problems with this idea and thats ok thats why i put it here in discussions and if theres anything that i didnt seem to mention about 106's contaimint shit plz do tell me.
     
  2. The Plebeian

    The Plebeian Active Member

    even breaching once a day is too often
     
  3. Gressmann

    Gressmann Epic Tier Member

    The last thing we need is 106 breaching more often.
     
  4. Chan

    Chan Active Member

    he doesnt even breach often only on like minge hour
     
  5. Lorth Pole

    Lorth Pole Kek Tier Member

    There is a reason he is kept in a closed cube that is elevated by magnets.
     
    SixBytes and Roozrokh like this.
  6. Gressmann

    Gressmann Epic Tier Member

    And that’s perfectly fine as it is. 106 is a bitch to recontain, so it’s a bitch to get breached as him.

    Because it takes so long to rectontain him, tests can’t be done in that time, other SCPs will be neglected by SID working to recontain 106, and D-Class RP becomes more nonexistent as Code Reds often = Lockdown.
     
  7. Chan

    Chan Active Member

    i see where your coming from but i still think 106 should still be able to breach just a little more oten then he currently can. The only want he can get breached if a d-class breaches him and that never happends cause our z-units too good
     
  8. Joyous Press

    Joyous Press Trusted Admin Trusted Admin ULTRA MEGA USER SCPRP Staff

    -Support His containment is made so that he cannot escape, if this were implemented then the containment methods IC would just be updated and a new CC would be made.
     
  9. Chan

    Chan Active Member

    hmm yea i can see that point as well but if the foundation in cannon story cant keep him 100% contained then he can escape still
     
  10. Lorth Pole

    Lorth Pole Kek Tier Member

    Server canon isn't the same as Wiki canon.
     
  11. Chan

    Chan Active Member

    yea ik but im just trying to get more attention on 106 casue rn hes kinda borning to play unless its minge and rooz dont like that
     
  12. Windows

    Windows Ultra Tier Member

    This just slows down rp
     
  13. Lukaku

    Lukaku Expert Tier Retired Staff

    This can be abused to the shithouse, this just requires an admin to constantly watch 106. What happens when there aren’t any Admins on? Admins can’t check logs to see if he phased through shit.
     
  14. Burton Guster

    Burton Guster Expert Tier Member

    They'll never allow SCP to breach more often, people will bitch about it and there will be flame. I personally think SCP should be able to reach a bit more often because things get really boring throughout the day and having to breech every so often would make things a little more fun.
     
  15. Windows

    Windows Ultra Tier Member

    This would slow down rp and breaches are not always fun.
     
  16. Domo

    Domo Expert Tier Member ULTRA MEGA USER

    This is SCP RP not breach. Simple idea: don’t play 106 when nothing is happening. Play something else like 035, 2337, 999, 208, high activity SCPs.
     
  17. Roozrokh

    Roozrokh Head Admin Staff Member Head Administrator SCPRP Staff Recruitment Team

    No
     
    Sanchioso likes this.
  18. Burton Guster

    Burton Guster Expert Tier Member

    That's what they always say. SCP breach all the time in the official game/story, playing the more passive SCP gets old real quick, especially when it's all day everyday. We should use every SCP to the fullest extent be it RP or tests, make things more interesting
     
    Gerald David likes this.
  19. Roozrokh

    Roozrokh Head Admin Staff Member Head Administrator SCPRP Staff Recruitment Team


    they don't breach all the time
     
  20. Pillhook

    Pillhook Sector Admin Staff Member Sector Admin SCPRP Staff Recruitment Team

    Donno how you can be an ex-SID captain and say he's hard to recontain, you can do it with 1 person easily.

    It's the same with bashing doors but we don't really have any problems with 2292, 082 etc.

    But yeah as lore/rooz said it wouldn't make sense, and it's not something we need atm, even if i personally don't really mind scps that don't release others breaching.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.